Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U vs A8-3500M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A8-3500M
2011
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
0.79
Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U
2024
8 cores / 16 threads, 28 Watt
13.63
+1625%

Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U outperforms A8-3500M by a whopping 1625% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2815595
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD A-Seriesno data
Power efficiency0.9520.57
DesignerAMDAMD
Manufacturerno dataTSMC
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)Hawk Point (2024−2025)
Release date14 June 2011 (14 years ago)16 April 2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

A8-3500M and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads416
Base clock speed1.5 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz5.1 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm4 nm
Die size228 mm2178 mm2
Number of transistors1,178 million25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on A8-3500M and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFS1FP7
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-3500M and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, Radeon HD 6620Gno data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-3500M and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-3500M and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 6620G (444 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8-3500M and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

A8-3500M 0.79
Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U 13.63
+1625%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

A8-3500M 1394
Samples: 269
Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U 23951
+1618%
Samples: 205

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.79 13.63
Integrated graphics card 0.77 15.65
Recency 14 June 2011 16 April 2024
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 16
Chip lithography 32 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 28 Watt

Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U has a 1625.3% higher aggregate performance score, 1932.5% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 12 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 700% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD A8-3500M in performance tests.

Be aware that A8-3500M is a notebook processor while Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8-3500M
A8-3500M
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U
Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 129 votes

Rate A8-3500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 23 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors A8-3500M and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.