Phenom II X4 P920 vs A8-3500M

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

A8-3500M
2011
4 cores / 4 threads
0.91
+3.4%
Phenom II X4 P920
2010
4 cores / 4 threads
0.88

A8-3500M outperforms Phenom II X4 P920 by 3% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing A8-3500M and Phenom II X4 P920 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking23992419
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-Series4x AMD Phenom II
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)Champlain (2010−2011)
Release date14 June 2011 (12 years ago)12 May 2010 (13 years ago)
Current price$51 $122

Technical specs

A8-3500M and Phenom II X4 P920 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.5 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus supportno data3600 MHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)512 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)2 MB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size228 mm2no data
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on A8-3500M and Phenom II X4 P920 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFS1S1 (S1g4)
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-3500M and Phenom II X4 P920. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, Radeon HD 6620G, DDR3(L)-1333 Memory ControllerMMX, 3DNow, SSE (1,2,3,4A), AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization, integrated DDR3-1066 memory controller, HyperTransport 3.0
VirusProtectno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-3500M and Phenom II X4 P920 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-3500M and Phenom II X4 P920. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 6620Gno data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A8-3500M 0.91
+3.4%
Phenom II X4 P920 0.88

A8-3500M outperforms Phenom II X4 P920 by 3% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A8-3500M 231
+31.3%
Phenom II X4 P920 176

A8-3500M outperforms Phenom II X4 P920 by 31% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A8-3500M 620
+5.3%
Phenom II X4 P920 589

A8-3500M outperforms Phenom II X4 P920 by 5% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

A8-3500M 1586
+13.7%
Phenom II X4 P920 1395

A8-3500M outperforms Phenom II X4 P920 by 14% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A8-3500M 5170
+2.5%
Phenom II X4 P920 5042

A8-3500M outperforms Phenom II X4 P920 by 3% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A8-3500M 2256
+8.3%
Phenom II X4 P920 2083

A8-3500M outperforms Phenom II X4 P920 by 8% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

A8-3500M 24.09
Phenom II X4 P920 24
+0.4%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

A8-3500M 2
+3.9%
Phenom II X4 P920 2

A8-3500M outperforms Phenom II X4 P920 by 4% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 0.91 0.88
Recency 14 June 2011 12 May 2010
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 25 Watt

We couldn't decide between A8-3500M and Phenom II X4 P920. The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions on choice between A8-3500M and Phenom II X4 P920, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8-3500M
A8-3500M
AMD Phenom II X4 P920
Phenom II X4 P920

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 110 votes

Rate A8-3500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 35 votes

Rate Phenom II X4 P920 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about A8-3500M or Phenom II X4 P920, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.