Celeron G3900TE vs A6-9500E

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

A6-9500E
2017
2 cores / 2 threads
1.14
Celeron G3900TE
2015
2 cores / 2 threads
1.20
+5.3%

Celeron G3900TE outperforms A6-9500E by 5% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing A6-9500E and Celeron G3900TE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking22602223
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money7.951.35
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Skylake (2015−2016)
Release date27 July 2017 (6 years ago)19 October 2015 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$42
Current price$32 $42 (1x MSRP)

Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

A6-9500E has 489% better value for money than Celeron G3900TE.

Technical specs

A6-9500E and Celeron G3900TE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed3 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz2.3 GHz
Bus supportno data4 × 8 GT/s
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cache1024 KB512 KB
L3 cache0 KB2 MB
Chip lithography28 nm14 nm
Die size246 mm298.57 mm210.3 mm × 9.57 mm
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on A6-9500E and Celeron G3900TE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM4LGA-1151
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-9500E and Celeron G3900TE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+no data
AVX++
FRTC1no data
FreeSync1no data
PowerTune+no data
TrueAudio+no data
PowerNow+no data
PowerGating+no data
VirusProtect+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-9500E and Celeron G3900TE are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-9500E and Celeron G3900TE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR3L-1600
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data34.134 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R5 GraphicsIntel HD Graphics 510
iGPU core count4no data
Enduro+no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A6-9500E and Celeron G3900TE integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A6-9500E and Celeron G3900TE integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan1no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-9500E and Celeron G3900TE.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes816

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-9500E 1.14
Celeron G3900TE 1.20
+5.3%

Celeron G3900TE outperforms A6-9500E by 5% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A6-9500E 1756
Celeron G3900TE 1850
+5.4%

Celeron G3900TE outperforms A6-9500E by 5% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 1.14 1.20
Integrated graphics card 1.37
Recency 27 July 2017 19 October 2015
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm

We couldn't decide between A6-9500E and Celeron G3900TE. The differences in performance seem too small.

Note that A6-9500E is a desktop processor while Celeron G3900TE is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-9500E and Celeron G3900TE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-9500E
A6-9500E
Intel Celeron G3900TE
Celeron G3900TE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 40 votes

Rate A6-9500E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Celeron G3900TE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-9500E or Celeron G3900TE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.