Celeron J1900 vs A6-9500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-9500
2017
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
1.22
+64.9%

A6-9500 outperforms Celeron J1900 by an impressive 65% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A6-9500 and Celeron J1900 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking22452571
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.62no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Bay Trail-D (2013)
Release date27 July 2017 (6 years ago)1 November 2013 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$64$82
Current price$36 (0.6x MSRP)$163 (2x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A6-9500 and Celeron J1900 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz2.42 GHz
L1 cacheno data224 KB
L2 cache1024 KB2 MB
L3 cache0 KB2 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography28 nm22 nm
Die size246 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °C105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on A6-9500 and Celeron J1900 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM4FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-9500 and Celeron J1900. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA+no data
AVX+no data
FRTC1no data
FreeSync1no data
PowerTune+no data
TrueAudio+no data
PowerNow+no data
PowerGating+no data
VirusProtect+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
SIPPno data-
PAEno data36 Bit
FDIno data-
Statusno dataLaunched
RSTno data-

Security technologies

A6-9500 and Celeron J1900 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+
Identity Protectionno data-
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-9500 and Celeron J1900 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-9500 and Celeron J1900. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channels22
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R5 GraphicsIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series
iGPU core count6no data
Quick Sync Videono data+
Enduro+no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data
Graphics max frequencyno data854 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A6-9500 and Celeron J1900 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A6-9500 and Celeron J1900 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan1no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-9500 and Celeron J1900.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes84

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-9500 1.22
+64.9%
Celeron J1900 0.74

A6-9500 outperforms Celeron J1900 by 65% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A6-9500 1881
+63.6%
Celeron J1900 1150

A6-9500 outperforms Celeron J1900 by 64% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A6-9500 654
+278%
Celeron J1900 173

A6-9500 outperforms Celeron J1900 by 278% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A6-9500 960
+84.6%
Celeron J1900 520

A6-9500 outperforms Celeron J1900 by 85% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.22 0.74
Recency 27 July 2017 1 November 2013
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Cost $64 $82
Chip lithography 28 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 10 Watt

The A6-9500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J1900 in performance tests.

Note that A6-9500 is a desktop processor while Celeron J1900 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-9500 and Celeron J1900, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-9500
A6-9500
Intel Celeron J1900
Celeron J1900

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 176 votes

Rate A6-9500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 183 votes

Rate Celeron J1900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-9500 or Celeron J1900, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.