AMD A6-9225 vs E2-1800

AMD A6-9225
AMD E2-1800

General info

Comparing A6-9225 and E2-1800 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture and sales start time and price.
Place in performance rating
AMD Bristol Ridge
AMD E-Series
Achitecture codename
Stoney Ridge
Release date
1 June 2018
June 2012

Technical specs

A6-9225 and E2-1800 quantitative parameters such as cores and threads number, clocks, manufacturing process, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of A6-9225 and E2-1800 performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Number of cores
Number of threads
Maximum frequency
3 GHz
1.7 GHz
L1 cache
160 KB
128 KB
L2 cache
1 MB
1024 KB
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
40 nm
Die size
124.5 mm2
75 mm2
Maximum core temperature
90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)
100 °C
Transistor count
1200 Million
64 bit support


Information on A6-9225 and E2-1800 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one.
Max number of CPUs in a configuration
FT1 BGA 413-Ball
Power consumption (TDP)
10-15 Watt
18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-9225 and E2-1800. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-9225 and E2-1800 are enumerated here.

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel number of RAM supported by A6-9225 and E2-1800.
Supported memory types

Graphics specifications

General parameters of GPUs integrated into A6-9225 and E2-1800.
Integrated graphics
AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 655 MHz)

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmarks performance of A6-9225 and E2-1800. Overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.

Overall benchmark performance

A6-9225 4.43
E2-1800 4.43

3DMark06 CPU

A6-9225 2132 +96.9%
E2-1800 1083

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

A6-9225 2532 +128.1%
E2-1800 1110

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

A6-9225 4193 +97.7%
E2-1800 2121

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

A6-9225 1 +157.6%
E2-1800 0

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

A6-9225 1 +100%
E2-1800 1

wPrime 32

A6-9225 26 +162.7%
E2-1800 69

WinRAR 4.0

A6-9225 852 +75.3%
E2-1800 486

x264 encoding pass 1

A6-9225 49 +172.2%
E2-1800 18

x264 encoding pass 2

A6-9225 9 +200%
E2-1800 3

TrueCrypt AES

A6-9225 1 +900%
E2-1800 0

Geekbench 2

A6-9225 3936 +121%
E2-1800 1781

Gaming performance

Let's see how good A6-9225 and E2-1800 are for gaming compared with game system requirements. Remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect real performance inaccurately.

Advantages of AMD A6-9225

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 vs 40 nm)
Less power hungry (10 vs 18 watts)

Advantages of AMD E2-1800

SSE (Streaming SIMD Instructions - a SIMD instruction extension working with 128-bit registers)
MMX (MultiMedia Extensions - the very first (1996) SIMD instruction expansion for Intel desktop CPUs, works with 64-bit registers)
3DNow! (older SIMD instructions set used by AMD CPUs. Supercedes MMX, works with 64-bit registers)
AMD64 (AMD CPUs 64-bit architecture. Almost identical to Intel 64, save for some little and rarely used nuances)

So, A6-9225 or E2-1800?

Technical City couldn't decide between AMD A6-9225 and AMD E2-1800. The differences in performance seem too small.
Should you still have questions on choice between A6-9225 and E2-1800, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favourite CPU.
AMD A6-9225
AMD E2-1800

User rating

Here you can see the rating of the processor by users, as well as give your rating.

Advices and comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-9225 or E2-1800, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.