AMD A6-9225 vs A6-9220C
Comparing A6-9225 and A6-9220C processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture and sales start time and price.
A6-9225 and A6-9220C quantitative parameters such as cores and threads number, clocks, manufacturing process, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of A6-9225 and A6-9220C performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Number of cores
Number of threads
Manufacturing process technology
Maximum core temperature
64 bit support
Information on A6-9225 and A6-9220C compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one.
Power consumption (TDP)
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-9225 and A6-9220C are enumerated here.
General parameters of GPUs integrated into A6-9225 and A6-9220C.
AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 655 MHz)
AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 720 MHz)
Non-gaming benchmarks performance of A6-9225 and A6-9220C. Overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall benchmark performance
A6-9225 1.52 +5.6%
A6-9225 1350 +6%
Let's see how good A6-9225 and A6-9220C are for gaming compared with game system requirements. Remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect real performance inaccurately.
Advantages of AMD A6-9225
5.6% faster in synthetic tests
Higher maximum frequency (3000 vs 2700 MHz)
Higher base frequency (2600 vs 1800 MHz)
Advantages of AMD A6-9220C
Somewhat newer (31 January 2019 vs 1 June 2018)
Less power hungry (6 vs 10 watts)
So, A6-9225 or A6-9220C?
Technical City couldn't decide between AMD A6-9225 and AMD A6-9220C. The differences in performance seem too small.
Should you still have questions on choice between A6-9225 and A6-9220C, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.