E2-3200 vs A6-9210

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-9210
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.78
+23.8%

A6-9210 outperforms E2-3200 by a significant 24% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A6-9210 and E2-3200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking25332676
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.30
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Bristol Ridgeno data
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)Llano (2011−2012)
Release date1 June 2016 (8 years ago)7 September 2011 (12 years ago)
Current price$1030 $22

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A6-9210 and E2-3200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz2.4 GHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB (per core)
L2 cache1024 KB512 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm32 nm
Die size124.5 mm2228 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors1200 Million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on A6-9210 and E2-3200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP4FM1
Power consumption (TDP)10-15 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-9210 and E2-3200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsSingle-Channel DDR4-2133, Virtualization,no data
AES-NI1no data
FMAFMA4no data
PowerTune-no data
TrueAudio-no data
PowerNow-no data
PowerGating-no data
Out-of-band client management-no data
VirusProtect-no data
RAID-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-9210 and E2-3200 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-9210 and E2-3200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2133DDR3
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R4 GraphicsRadeon HD 6370D
iGPU core count3no data
Enduro+no data
Switchable graphics1no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A6-9210 and E2-3200 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A6-9210 and E2-3200 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan1no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-9210 and E2-3200.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes8no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-9210 0.78
+23.8%
E2-3200 0.63

A6-9210 outperforms E2-3200 by 24% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A6-9210 1210
+25%
E2-3200 968

A6-9210 outperforms E2-3200 by 25% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A6-9210 332
+11.4%
E2-3200 298

A6-9210 outperforms E2-3200 by 11% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A6-9210 518
E2-3200 525
+1.4%

E2-3200 outperforms A6-9210 by 1% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.78 0.63
Recency 1 June 2016 7 September 2011
Chip lithography 28 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 65 Watt

The A6-9210 is our recommended choice as it beats the E2-3200 in performance tests.

Be aware that A6-9210 is a notebook processor while E2-3200 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-9210 and E2-3200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-9210
A6-9210
AMD E2-3200
E2-3200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 151 vote

Rate A6-9210 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 21 vote

Rate E2-3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-9210 or E2-3200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.