A9-9420e vs E2-3200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

E2-3200
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.56

A9-9420e outperforms E2-3200 by a moderate 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30753007
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Bristol Ridge
Power efficiency0.92no data
DesignerAMDAMD
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date7 September 2011 (14 years ago)1 June 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

E2-3200 and A9-9420e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.4 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz2.5 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache512 KB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography32 nm28 nm
Die size228 mm2124.5 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Number of transistors1,178 million1200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on E2-3200 and A9-9420e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFM1BGA
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt1 MB

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-3200 and A9-9420e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataVirtualization,

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-3200 and A9-9420e are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-3200 and A9-9420e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardRadeon HD 6370DAMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

E2-3200 0.56
A9-9420e 0.62
+10.7%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

E2-3200 986
Samples: 74
A9-9420e 1101
+11.7%
Samples: 102

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.56 0.62
Recency 7 September 2011 1 June 2018
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 1 Watt

A9-9420e has a 10.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 6400% lower power consumption.

The AMD A9-9420e is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD E2-3200 in performance tests.

Note that E2-3200 is a desktop processor while A9-9420e is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E2-3200
E2-3200
AMD A9-9420e
A9-9420e

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 23 votes

Rate E2-3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 153 votes

Rate A9-9420e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors E2-3200 and A9-9420e, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.