Celeron M 390 vs A6-9210

Primary details

Comparing A6-9210 and Celeron M 390 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	2634	3258
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	AMD Bristol Ridge	Celeron M
Power efficiency	4.98	0.81
Architecture codename	Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)	Dothan (2004−2005)
Release date	1 June 2016 (8 years ago)	no data

Detailed specifications

A6-9210 and Celeron M 390 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	1 (Single-Core)
Threads	2	1
Base clock speed	2.4 GHz	1.7 GHz
Boost clock speed	2.8 GHz	1.7 GHz
Bus rate	no data	400 MHz
L2 cache	1024 KB	no data
L3 cache	no data	1 MB L2 KB
Chip lithography	28 nm	90 nm
Die size	124.5 mm2	no data
Maximum core temperature	90 °C	100 °C
Number of transistors	1200 Million	no data
64 bit support	+	-
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
VID voltage range	no data	1.004V-1.292V

Compatibility

Information on A6-9210 and Celeron M 390 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Socket	FP4	PPGA478, H-PBGA479
Power consumption (TDP)	10-15 Watt	21 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-9210 and Celeron M 390. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Virtualization,	no data
AES-NI	+	-
FMA	FMA4	-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	no data	-
Turbo Boost Technology	no data	-
Hyper-Threading Technology	no data	-
Idle States	no data	-
Demand Based Switching	no data	-
PAE	no data	32 Bit
FSB parity	no data	-

Security technologies

A6-9210 and Celeron M 390 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	no data	-
EDB	no data	+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-9210 and Celeron M 390 are enumerated here.

AMD-V	+	-
VT-x	no data	-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-9210 and Celeron M 390. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR4-2133	no data
Max memory channels	1	no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card	AMD Radeon R4 Graphics	no data
iGPU core count	3	no data
Enduro	+	-
Switchable graphics	+	-
UVD	+	-
VCE	+	-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A6-9210 and Celeron M 390 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort	+	-
HDMI	+	-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A6-9210 and Celeron M 390 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX	DirectX® 12	no data
Vulkan	+	-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-9210 and Celeron M 390.

PCIe version	3.0	no data
PCI Express lanes	8	no data

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	0.79	0.18
Physical cores	2	1
Threads	2	1
Chip lithography	28 nm	90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	21 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between A6-9210 and Celeron M 390, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---