Sempron 3850 vs A6-5400K

VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-5400K
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.81
+11%
Sempron 3850
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 25 Watt
0.73

A6-5400K outperforms Sempron 3850 by a moderate 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A6-5400K and Sempron 3850 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25972679
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.172.75
Architecture codenameTrinity (2012−2013)Kabini (2013−2014)
Release date2 October 2012 (12 years ago)9 April 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A6-5400K and Sempron 3850 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed3.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz1.3 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)256 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)2048 KB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography32 nm28 nm
Die size246 mm2107 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)70 °C90 °C
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on A6-5400K and Sempron 3850 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2AM1
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-5400K and Sempron 3850. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
FMA-FMA4
AVX-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-5400K and Sempron 3850 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-5400K and Sempron 3850. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-1600
Max memory channelsno data1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardRadeon HD 7540DAMD Radeon R3 Graphics
Number of pipelinesno data128
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A6-5400K and Sempron 3850 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A6-5400K and Sempron 3850 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-5400K and Sempron 3850.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data4

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-5400K 0.81
+11%
Sempron 3850 0.73

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A6-5400K 1275
+10.9%
Sempron 3850 1150

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A6-5400K 381
+138%
Sempron 3850 160

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A6-5400K 512
Sempron 3850 535
+4.5%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.81 0.73
Recency 2 October 2012 9 April 2014
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 25 Watt

A6-5400K has a 11% higher aggregate performance score.

Sempron 3850, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 160% lower power consumption.

The A6-5400K is our recommended choice as it beats the Sempron 3850 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-5400K and Sempron 3850, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-5400K
A6-5400K
AMD Sempron 3850
Sempron 3850

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 163 votes

Rate A6-5400K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 6 votes

Rate Sempron 3850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-5400K or Sempron 3850, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.