Ryzen 9 7845HX vs A8-3800
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 9 7845HX outperforms A8-3800 by a whopping 2139% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing A8-3800 and Ryzen 9 7845HX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2170 | 135 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 2.06 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Architecture codename | Llano (2011−2012) | Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4) |
| Release date | 30 June 2011 (13 years ago) | 4 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
| Current price | $40 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
A8-3800 and Ryzen 9 7845HX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 24 |
| Base clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.7 GHz | 5.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 64 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | CCD = 5 nm, I/O = 6 nm |
| Die size | 228 mm2 | 2x 71 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 1,178 million | 13,140 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | Yes |
Compatibility
Information on A8-3800 and Ryzen 9 7845HX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FM1 | FL1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 55 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-3800 and Ryzen 9 7845HX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | DDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 5, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME |
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| FMA | no data | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-3800 and Ryzen 9 7845HX are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-3800 and Ryzen 9 7845HX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon HD 6550D | AMD Radeon 610M |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8-3800 and Ryzen 9 7845HX.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 28 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Ryzen 9 7845HX outperforms A8-3800 by 2139% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Ryzen 9 7845HX outperforms A8-3800 by 2137% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Ryzen 9 7845HX outperforms A8-3800 by 805% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Ryzen 9 7845HX outperforms A8-3800 by 1437% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.32 | 29.56 |
| Integrated graphics card | 1.04 | 2.86 |
| Recency | 30 June 2011 | 4 January 2023 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 12 |
| Threads | 4 | 24 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 55 Watt |
The Ryzen 9 7845HX is our recommended choice as it beats the A8-3800 in performance tests.
Note that A8-3800 is a desktop processor while Ryzen 9 7845HX is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between A8-3800 and Ryzen 9 7845HX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
