Atom D2560 vs A6-3410MX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

A6-3410MX
2011
4 cores / 4 threads, 45 Watt
0.72
+188%

A6-3410MX outperforms Atom D2560 by a whopping 188% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28873404
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-SeriesIntel Atom
Power efficiency0.681.06
DesignerAMDIntel
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)Cedarview (2011−2012)
Release date14 June 2011 (14 years ago)24 October 2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A6-3410MX and Atom D2560 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.6 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz2 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache0 KB1 MB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size228 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.91V -1.21V

Compatibility

Information on A6-3410MX and Atom D2560 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFS1FCBGA559
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-3410MX and Atom D2560. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, Radeon HD 6480GIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
vProno data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
PAEno data36 Bit

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-3410MX and Atom D2560 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-3410MX and Atom D2560. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-800, DDR3-1066
Maximum memory sizeno data4 GB
Max memory channelsno data1
Maximum memory bandwidthno data6.4 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 6520G (400 MHz)Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 (640 MHz)

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A6-3410MX and Atom D2560 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-3410MX and Atom D2560.

PCI Express lanesno data4

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

A6-3410MX 0.72
+188%
Atom D2560 0.25

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

A6-3410MX 1274
+194%
Samples: 146
Atom D2560 433
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.72 0.25
Recency 14 June 2011 24 October 2012
Physical cores 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 10 Watt

A6-3410MX has a 188% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores.

Atom D2560, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 350% lower power consumption.

The AMD A6-3410MX is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom D2560 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-3410MX
A6-3410MX
Intel Atom D2560
Atom D2560

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 49 votes

Rate A6-3410MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom D2560 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors A6-3410MX and Atom D2560, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.