A4-3300M vs A6-3410MX

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

A6-3410MX
2011
4 cores / 4 threads
0.82
+6.5%

A6-3410MX outperforms A4-3300M by 6% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A6-3410MX and A4-3300M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking24722521
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-SeriesAMD A-Series
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)Llano (2011−2012)
Release date14 June 2011 (12 years ago)14 June 2011 (12 years ago)
Current price$15.49 $61

Detailed specifications

A6-3410MX and A4-3300M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.6 GHz1.9 GHz
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz2.5 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)128 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size228 mm2228 mm2
Number of transistors1,178 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on A6-3410MX and A4-3300M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFS1FS1
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-3410MX and A4-3300M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, Radeon HD 6480G, DDR3(L)-1333 Memory Controller3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, DDR3 Memory Controller, Radeon HD 6480G

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-3410MX and A4-3300M are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-3410MX and A4-3300M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 6520GAMD Radeon HD 6480G

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-3410MX 0.82
+6.5%
A4-3300M 0.77

A6-3410MX outperforms A4-3300M by 6% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A6-3410MX 1263
+6.5%
A4-3300M 1186

A6-3410MX outperforms A4-3300M by 6% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A6-3410MX 257
+13.2%
A4-3300M 227

A6-3410MX outperforms A4-3300M by 13% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A6-3410MX 750
+88%
A4-3300M 399

A6-3410MX outperforms A4-3300M by 88% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

A6-3410MX 1707
A4-3300M 1742
+2%

A4-3300M outperforms A6-3410MX by 2% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A6-3410MX 5568
+62.9%
A4-3300M 3417

A6-3410MX outperforms A4-3300M by 63% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A6-3410MX 2414
+55.1%
A4-3300M 1556

A6-3410MX outperforms A4-3300M by 55% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

A6-3410MX 22.15
+81.5%
A4-3300M 40.2

A4-3300M outperforms A6-3410MX by 81% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

A6-3410MX 2
+80.4%
A4-3300M 1

A6-3410MX outperforms A4-3300M by 80% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.82 0.77
Integrated graphics card 0.77 0.66
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 35 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between A6-3410MX and A4-3300M.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-3410MX and A4-3300M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-3410MX
A6-3410MX
AMD A4-3300M
A4-3300M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 41 vote

Rate A6-3410MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 98 votes

Rate A4-3300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-3410MX or A4-3300M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.