i5-1034G1 vs A6-3400M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-3400M
2011
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
0.70
Core i5-1034G1
2019
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
5.16
+637%

Core i5-1034G1 outperforms A6-3400M by a whopping 637% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29711417
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-SeriesIntel Core i5
Power efficiency0.8414.51
DesignerAMDIntel
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)Ice Lake U (2019−2020)
Release date14 June 2011 (14 years ago)29 May 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A6-3400M and Core i5-1034G1 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed1.4 GHz0.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz3.6 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)192 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)2 MB
L3 cache0 KB6 MB
Chip lithography32 nm10 nm
Die size228 mm2no data
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A6-3400M and Core i5-1034G1 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFS1no data
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-3400M and Core i5-1034G1. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, Radeon HD 6480Gno data
Turbo Boost Technologyno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-3400M and Core i5-1034G1 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-3400M and Core i5-1034G1. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 6520G (400 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) (300 MHz)

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.70 5.16
Integrated graphics card 0.72 2.86
Recency 14 June 2011 29 May 2019
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 32 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

i5-1034G1 has a 637% higher aggregate performance score, 297% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 7 years, 100% more threads, a 220% more advanced lithography process, and 133% lower power consumption.

The Intel Core i5-1034G1 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD A6-3400M in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 194 votes

Rate A6-3400M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 3 votes

Rate Core i5-1034G1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors A6-3400M and Core i5-1034G1, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.