A4-9120 vs A6-3400M

Place in the ranking	2667	2654
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	AMD A-Series	Bristol Ridge
Power efficiency	2.03	4.86
Architecture codename	Llano (2011−2012)	Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date	14 June 2011 (13 years ago)	1 June 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A6-3400M and A4-9120 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	4 (Quad-Core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	4	2
Base clock speed	1.4 GHz	2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed	2.3 GHz	2.5 GHz
L1 cache	128 KB (per core)	160 KB
L2 cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB
L3 cache	0 KB	no data
Chip lithography	32 nm	28 nm
Die size	228 mm²	124.5 mm²
Maximum core temperature	no data	90 °C
Number of transistors	1,178 million	1200 Million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-

Compatibility

Information on A6-3400M and A4-9120 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	no data
Socket	FS1	BGA
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-3400M and A4-9120. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions

3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, Radeon HD 6480G

Virtualization,

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-3400M and A4-9120 are enumerated here.

AMD-V

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-3400M and A4-9120. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

DDR3

DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare

AMD Radeon HD 6520G (400 MHz)

AMD Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 655 MHz)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-3400M 0.75

A4-9120 0.77
+2.7%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A6-3400M 1193

A4-9120 1217
+2%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.75	0.77
Integrated graphics card	0.78	1.03
Recency	14 June 2011	1 June 2017
Physical cores	4	2
Threads	4	2
Chip lithography	32 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	15 Watt

A6-3400M has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

A4-9120, on the other hand, has a 2.7% higher aggregate performance score, 32.1% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 5 years, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between A6-3400M and A4-9120.

Should you still have questions on choice between A6-3400M and A4-9120, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.