Celeron 560 vs A4-9120C

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A4-9120C
2019
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.54
+157%

A4-9120C outperforms Celeron 560 by a whopping 157% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A4-9120C and Celeron 560 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28573211
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Bristol Ridgeno data
Power efficiency8.510.64
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)no data
Release date6 January 2019 (5 years ago)1 January 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A4-9120C and Celeron 560 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)no data
Threads2no data
Base clock speedno data2.13 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHzno data
Multiplier16no data
L1 cache160 KBno data
L2 cache1 MBno data
L3 cacheno data1 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography28 nm65 nm
Die size124.5 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors1200 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.95V-1.3V

Compatibility

Information on A4-9120C and Celeron 560 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketBGAPPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt31 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-9120C and Celeron 560. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsVirtualization,no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

A4-9120C and Celeron 560 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-9120C and Celeron 560 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-9120C and Celeron 560. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth14.936 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 600 MHz)no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A4-9120C 0.54
+157%
Celeron 560 0.21

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A4-9120C 850
+151%
Celeron 560 339

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.54 0.21
Recency 6 January 2019 1 January 2008
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 31 Watt

A4-9120C has a 157.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 132.1% more advanced lithography process, and 416.7% lower power consumption.

The A4-9120C is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 560 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A4-9120C and Celeron 560, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A4-9120C
A4-9120C
Intel Celeron 560
Celeron 560

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.2 80 votes

Rate A4-9120C on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 15 votes

Rate Celeron 560 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A4-9120C or Celeron 560, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.