AMD A4-6210 vs Athlon X2 QL-64
Comparing A4-6210 and Athlon X2 QL-64 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture and sales start time and price.
A4-6210 and Athlon X2 QL-64 quantitative parameters such as cores and threads number, clocks, manufacturing process, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of A4-6210 and Athlon X2 QL-64 performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Number of cores
Number of threads
Manufacturing process technology
64 bit support
Information on A4-6210 and Athlon X2 QL-64 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one.
Max number of CPUs in a configuration
Power consumption (TDP)
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-6210 and Athlon X2 QL-64. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-6210 and Athlon X2 QL-64 are enumerated here.
Types, maximum amount and channel number of RAM supported by A4-6210 and Athlon X2 QL-64.
Supported memory types
Max memory channels
General parameters of GPUs integrated into A4-6210 and Athlon X2 QL-64.
Available interfaces and connections of A4-6210 and Athlon X2 QL-64 integrated GPUs.
Graphics API support
APIs supported by A4-6210 and Athlon X2 QL-64 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A4-6210 and Athlon X2 QL-64.
Non-gaming benchmarks performance of A4-6210 and Athlon X2 QL-64. Overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall benchmark performance
Athlon X2 QL-64 8.30
A4-6210 2398 +63.4%
Athlon X2 QL-64 1468
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Athlon X2 QL-64 1614 +17.5%
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
A4-6210 4285 +33%
Athlon X2 QL-64 3223
A4-6210 34 +25.7%
Athlon X2 QL-64 43
Let's see how good A4-6210 and Athlon X2 QL-64 are for gaming compared with game system requirements. Remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect real performance inaccurately.
Advantages of AMD A4-6210
Finer manufacturing process technology (28 vs 65 nm)
Less power hungry (15 vs 35 watts)
x86-64 (a general name for 64-bit extension of x86 instruction set. There are AMD64 and Intel 64 versions that differ very little)
AES (Advanced Encryption Standard instructions set - hardware acceleration of AES encryption and decryption. Speeds up encryption software, e.g. Veracrypt)
AVX (Advanced Vector Extensions - a set of SIMD instructions working with 128- and 256-bit registers)
Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP)
Enduro (saves battery charge by automatically switching between an integrated and discrete AMD GPU depending on workload. Similar to NVIDIA Optimus)
Vulkan (a contemporary API for graphics acceleration, based on now-discontinued Mantle)
Advantages of AMD Athlon X2 QL-64
MMX (MultiMedia Extensions - the very first (1996) SIMD instruction expansion for Intel desktop CPUs, works with 64-bit registers)
AMD64 (AMD CPUs 64-bit architecture. Almost identical to Intel 64, save for some little and rarely used nuances)
3DNow! (older SIMD instructions set used by AMD CPUs. Supercedes MMX, works with 64-bit registers)
Virtualization (Hardware acceleration of virtual machines)
So, A4-6210 or Athlon X2 QL-64?
Technical City couldn't decide between AMD A4-6210 and AMD Athlon X2 QL-64. The differences in performance seem too small.
Should you still have questions on choice between A4-6210 and Athlon X2 QL-64, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.