A6-8500P vs A4-6210

VS

Aggregate performance score

A4-6210
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
0.94
+3.3%
A6-8500P
2015
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.91

A4-6210 outperforms A6-8500P by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A4-6210 and A6-8500P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25252541
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-SeriesAMD Carrizo
Power efficiency5.935.74
Architecture codenameBeema (2014)Carrizo (2015−2018)
Release date29 April 2014 (10 years ago)3 June 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A4-6210 and A6-8500P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speedno data1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz3 GHz
L2 cache2048 KB1024 KB
Chip lithography28 nm28 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Number of transistorsno data3100 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A4-6210 and A6-8500P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketFT3bFP4
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-6210 and A6-8500P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVXHSA 1.0
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4FMA4
AVX+AVX
FRTC-+
FreeSync-+
TrueAudio-+
PowerNow++
PowerGating++
Out-of-band client management-+
VirusProtect++
HSA-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-6210 and A6-8500P are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-6210 and A6-8500P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1599Not Listed
Max memory channels12

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R3 GraphicsAMD Radeon R5 Graphics
iGPU core countno data4
Enduro++
Switchable graphics++
UVD++
VCE++

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A4-6210 and A6-8500P integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort++
HDMI++

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A4-6210 and A6-8500P integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12DirectX® 12
Vulkan++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A4-6210 and A6-8500P.

PCIe version2.03.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A4-6210 0.94
+3.3%
A6-8500P 0.91

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A4-6210 1495
+3.5%
A6-8500P 1445

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.94 0.91
Recency 29 April 2014 3 June 2015
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2

A4-6210 has a 3.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

A6-8500P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between A4-6210 and A6-8500P.


Should you still have questions on choice between A4-6210 and A6-8500P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A4-6210
A4-6210
AMD A6-8500P
A6-8500P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 161 vote

Rate A4-6210 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate A6-8500P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A4-6210 or A6-8500P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.