Pentium M 735 vs A4-5150M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A4-5150M
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.48
+167%
Pentium M 735
2004
1 core / 1 thread, 7 Watt
0.18

A4-5150M outperforms Pentium M 735 by a whopping 167% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A4-5150M and Pentium M 735 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29113263
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-SeriesPentium M
Power efficiency1.300.81
Architecture codenameRichland (2013−2014)Dothan (2004−2005)
Release date12 March 2013 (11 years ago)10 May 2004 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A4-5150M and Pentium M 735 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed2.7 GHz1.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz1.7 GHz
Bus rateno data400 MHz
L1 cache128K (per core)32 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)2 MB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm90 nm
Die size246 mm287 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)105 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 million144 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.988V-1.34V

Compatibility

Information on A4-5150M and Pentium M 735 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFS1r2PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt7.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-5150M and Pentium M 735. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions32 nm, 0.925-no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data32 Bit
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

A4-5150M and Pentium M 735 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-5150M and Pentium M 735 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-5150M and Pentium M 735. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 8350G (514 - 720 MHz)On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A4-5150M 0.48
+167%
Pentium M 735 0.18

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

A4-5150M 2446
+67.6%
Pentium M 735 1459

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

A4-5150M 1881
+170%
Pentium M 735 698

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.48 0.18
Recency 12 March 2013 10 May 2004
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 32 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 7 Watt

A4-5150M has a 166.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 181.3% more advanced lithography process.

Pentium M 735, on the other hand, has 400% lower power consumption.

The A4-5150M is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium M 735 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A4-5150M and Pentium M 735, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A4-5150M
A4-5150M
Intel Pentium M 735
Pentium M 735

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 15 votes

Rate A4-5150M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 12 votes

Rate Pentium M 735 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A4-5150M or Pentium M 735, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.