Core Ultra 9 185H vs A4-5150M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing A4-5150M and Core Ultra 9 185H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated294
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-SeriesIntel Meteor Lake-H
Architecture codenameRichland (2013−2014)Meteor Lake-H
Release date12 March 2013 (11 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Current price$50 no data

Detailed specifications

A4-5150M and Core Ultra 9 185H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads222
Base clock speed2.7 GHz3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz5.1 GHz
L1 cache128K (per core)112 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm7 nm
Die size246 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)105 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on A4-5150M and Core Ultra 9 185H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFS1r2FCBGA2049
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-5150M and Core Ultra 9 185H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions32 nm, 0.925-Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NIno data+
AVXno data+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSXno data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
SIPPno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Statusno dataLaunched

Security technologies

A4-5150M and Core Ultra 9 185H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-5150M and Core Ultra 9 185H are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-5150M and Core Ultra 9 185H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5
Maximum memory sizeno data96 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 8350GIntel® Arc™ graphics
Quick Sync Videono data+
Graphics max frequencyno data2.35 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A4-5150M and Core Ultra 9 185H integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data4

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by A4-5150M and Core Ultra 9 185H integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)
Max resolution over eDPno data3840x2400 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A4-5150M and Core Ultra 9 185H integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12.2
OpenGLno data4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A4-5150M and Core Ultra 9 185H.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data28
PCI supportno data5.0 and 4.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A4-5150M 765
Ultra 9 185H 28594
+3638%

Core Ultra 9 185H outperforms A4-5150M by 3638% in Passmark.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

A4-5150M 2446
Ultra 9 185H 10300
+321%

Core Ultra 9 185H outperforms A4-5150M by 321% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A4-5150M 3589
Ultra 9 185H 59935
+1570%

Core Ultra 9 185H outperforms A4-5150M by 1570% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A4-5150M 1881
Ultra 9 185H 11420
+507%

Core Ultra 9 185H outperforms A4-5150M by 507% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

A4-5150M 43
Ultra 9 185H 5.68
+657%

A4-5150M outperforms Core Ultra 9 185H by 657% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

A4-5150M 1
Ultra 9 185H 34
+2777%

Core Ultra 9 185H outperforms A4-5150M by 2777% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

A4-5150M 101
Ultra 9 185H 2746
+2620%

Core Ultra 9 185H outperforms A4-5150M by 2620% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

A4-5150M 59
Ultra 9 185H 268
+353%

Core Ultra 9 185H outperforms A4-5150M by 353% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

A4-5150M 0.7
Ultra 9 185H 3.27
+367%

Core Ultra 9 185H outperforms A4-5150M by 367% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A4-5150M 0.8
Ultra 9 185H 9.6
+1180%

Core Ultra 9 185H outperforms A4-5150M by 1180% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A4-5150M 1167
Ultra 9 185H 12898
+1005%

Core Ultra 9 185H outperforms A4-5150M by 1005% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A4-5150M 8
Ultra 9 185H 158
+1878%

Core Ultra 9 185H outperforms A4-5150M by 1878% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A4-5150M 42
Ultra 9 185H 336
+699%

Core Ultra 9 185H outperforms A4-5150M by 699% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 March 2013 14 December 2023
Physical cores 2 16
Threads 2 22
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 45 Watt

We couldn't decide between A4-5150M and Core Ultra 9 185H. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between A4-5150M and Core Ultra 9 185H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A4-5150M
A4-5150M
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
Core Ultra 9 185H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 13 votes

Rate A4-5150M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 144 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 185H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A4-5150M or Core Ultra 9 185H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.