Celeron M U3400 vs A4-5150M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A4-5150M
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.48
+65.5%
Celeron M U3400
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 18 Watt
0.29

A4-5150M outperforms Celeron M U3400 by an impressive 66% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A4-5150M and Celeron M U3400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28963107
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-SeriesIntel Celeron M
Power efficiency1.301.52
Architecture codenameRichland (2013−2014)Arrandale (2010−2011)
Release date12 March 2013 (11 years ago)24 May 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A4-5150M and Celeron M U3400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.7 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz1.06 GHz
Bus rateno data2500 MHz
L1 cache128K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)512 KB
L3 cache0 KB2 MB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size246 mm281+114 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)105 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 million382+177 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A4-5150M and Celeron M U3400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFS1r2BGA1288
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-5150M and Celeron M U3400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions32 nm, 0.925-no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

A4-5150M and Celeron M U3400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-5150M and Celeron M U3400 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-5150M and Celeron M U3400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 8350G (514 - 720 MHz)no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A4-5150M 0.48
+65.5%
Celeron M U3400 0.29

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

A4-5150M 2446
+103%
Celeron M U3400 1205

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

A4-5150M 3589
+54.9%
Celeron M U3400 2317

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

A4-5150M 1881
+90.4%
Celeron M U3400 988

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

A4-5150M 43
+44.7%
Celeron M U3400 62.2

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.48 0.29
Recency 12 March 2013 24 May 2010
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 18 Watt

A4-5150M has a 65.5% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 2 years.

Celeron M U3400, on the other hand, has 94.4% lower power consumption.

The A4-5150M is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M U3400 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A4-5150M and Celeron M U3400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A4-5150M
A4-5150M
Intel Celeron M U3400
Celeron M U3400

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 15 votes

Rate A4-5150M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 4 votes

Rate Celeron M U3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A4-5150M or Celeron M U3400, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.