Xeon MP 3.16 vs A4-3300M
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2985 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | AMD A-Series | no data |
| Power efficiency | 0.82 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Llano (2011−2012) | Potomac (2005) |
| Release date | 14 June 2011 (14 years ago) | March 2005 (20 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
A4-3300M and Xeon MP 3.16 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 1.9 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 3.17 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 16 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 8 MB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | 228 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,178 million | 286 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on A4-3300M and Xeon MP 3.16 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FS1 | 604 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 135 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-3300M and Xeon MP 3.16. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | 3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, Radeon HD 6480G | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-3300M and Xeon MP 3.16 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-3300M and Xeon MP 3.16. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon HD 6480G (444 MHz) | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 135 Watt |
A4-3300M has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 181.3% more advanced lithography process, and 285.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD A4-3300M and Intel Xeon MP 3.16. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that A4-3300M is a notebook processor while Xeon MP 3.16 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
