3020e vs A4-3300

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

A4-3300
2011
2 cores / 2 threads
0.62
3020e
2020
2 cores / 2 threads
1.58
+155%

3020e outperforms A4-3300 by 155% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

Comparing A4-3300 and 3020e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking26511988
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation3.72no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)Dali (Zen)
Release date7 September 2011 (12 years ago)4 August 2020 (3 years ago)
Current price$40 no data

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed Specifications

A4-3300 and 3020e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.5 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz2.6 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)192 KB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache0 KB4 MB
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size228 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on A4-3300 and 3020e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFM1FT5
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-3300 and 3020e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataDDR4-2400, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NIno data+
FMAno data+
AVXno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-3300 and 3020e are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-3300 and 3020e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardRadeon HD 6410DAMD Radeon RX Vega 3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A4-3300 and 3020e.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A4-3300 0.62
3020e 1.58
+155%

3020e outperforms A4-3300 by 155% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A4-3300 962
3020e 2445
+154%

3020e outperforms A4-3300 by 154% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A4-3300 297
3020e 655
+121%

3020e outperforms A4-3300 by 121% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A4-3300 527
3020e 1091
+107%

3020e outperforms A4-3300 by 107% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 0.62 1.58
Recency 7 September 2011 4 August 2020
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 6 Watt

The 3020e is our recommended choice as it beats the A4-3300 in performance tests.

Note that A4-3300 is a desktop processor while 3020e is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A4-3300 and 3020e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A4-3300
A4-3300
AMD 3020e
3020e

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 98 votes

Rate A4-3300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 769 votes

Rate 3020e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about A4-3300 or 3020e, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.