Xeon w7-3555 vs A12-9800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing A12-9800 and Xeon w7-3555 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1796not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.64no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency3.31no data
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date27 July 2017 (7 years ago)24 August 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$139$2,339

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A12-9800 and Xeon w7-3555 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)28 (Octacosa-Core)
Threads456
Base clock speed3.8 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz4.8 GHz
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB75 MB
Chip lithography28 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size246 mm24x 477 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °C78 °C
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on A12-9800 and Xeon w7-3555 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM4FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt325 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A12-9800 and Xeon w7-3555. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
PowerTune+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

A12-9800 and Xeon w7-3555 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A12-9800 and Xeon w7-3555 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A12-9800 and Xeon w7-3555. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TB
Max memory channels28
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 GraphicsN/A
iGPU core count8no data
Enduro+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A12-9800 and Xeon w7-3555 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A12-9800 and Xeon w7-3555 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A12-9800 and Xeon w7-3555.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes8112

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 July 2017 24 August 2024
Physical cores 4 28
Threads 4 56
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 325 Watt

A12-9800 has 400% lower power consumption.

Xeon w7-3555, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, and 600% more physical cores and 1300% more threads.

We couldn't decide between A12-9800 and Xeon w7-3555. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that A12-9800 is a desktop processor while Xeon w7-3555 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A12-9800 and Xeon w7-3555, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A12-9800
A12-9800
Intel Xeon w7-3555
Xeon w7-3555

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 195 votes

Rate A12-9800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon w7-3555 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A12-9800 or Xeon w7-3555, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.