Ryzen 7 7840HS vs A10 Micro-6700T

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A10 Micro-6700T
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 4 Watt
0.92
Ryzen 7 7840HS
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
18.72
+1935%

Ryzen 7 7840HS outperforms A10 Micro-6700T by a whopping 1935% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10 Micro-6700T and Ryzen 7 7840HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2428287
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-Seriesno data
Architecture codenameMullins (2014)Phoenix-HS (Zen 4)
Release date29 April 2014 (10 years ago)January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

A10 Micro-6700T and Ryzen 7 7840HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads416
Base clock speed1.2 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz5.1 GHz
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data178 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistorsno data25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on A10 Micro-6700T and Ryzen 7 7840HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFT3bFP8
Power consumption (TDP)4.5 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10 Micro-6700T and Ryzen 7 7840HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, Single-Channel DDR3L-1333DDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4+
AVX++
PowerTune-no data
TrueAudio-no data
PowerNow+no data
PowerGating+no data
Out-of-band client management-no data
VirusProtect+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10 Micro-6700T and Ryzen 7 7840HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V1+
IOMMU 2.0+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10 Micro-6700T and Ryzen 7 7840HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1333DDR5
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R6 GraphicsAMD Radeon 780M
Enduro+no data
Switchable graphics1no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10 Micro-6700T and Ryzen 7 7840HS integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10 Micro-6700T and Ryzen 7 7840HS integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan1no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10 Micro-6700T and Ryzen 7 7840HS.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10 Micro-6700T 0.92
Ryzen 7 7840HS 18.72
+1935%

Ryzen 7 7840HS outperforms A10 Micro-6700T by 1935% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A10 Micro-6700T 1426
Ryzen 7 7840HS 28960
+1931%

Ryzen 7 7840HS outperforms A10 Micro-6700T by 1931% in Passmark.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

A10 Micro-6700T 1
Ryzen 7 7840HS 30
+1912%

Ryzen 7 7840HS outperforms A10 Micro-6700T by 1912% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

A10 Micro-6700T 0.55
Ryzen 7 7840HS 3.31
+502%

Ryzen 7 7840HS outperforms A10 Micro-6700T by 502% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A10 Micro-6700T 0.9
Ryzen 7 7840HS 14.8
+1491%

Ryzen 7 7840HS outperforms A10 Micro-6700T by 1491% in TrueCrypt AES.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.92 18.72
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 16
Chip lithography 28 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 35 Watt

The Ryzen 7 7840HS is our recommended choice as it beats the A10 Micro-6700T in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10 Micro-6700T and Ryzen 7 7840HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10 Micro-6700T
A10 Micro-6700T
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
Ryzen 7 7840HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1 vote

Rate A10 Micro-6700T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 1288 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 7840HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10 Micro-6700T or Ryzen 7 7840HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.