Ryzen 7 4700U vs A10-9620P

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

A10-9620P
2017
4 cores / 4 threads
1.65

Ryzen 7 4700U outperforms A10-9620P by a whopping 425% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10-9620P and Ryzen 7 4700U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1962806
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesBristol RidgeAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Renoir-U (Zen 2)
Release date1 January 2017 (7 years ago)6 January 2020 (4 years ago)
Current price$886 $521

Detailed specifications

A10-9620P and Ryzen 7 4700U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed2.5 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz4.2 GHz
L1 cacheno data128K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm7 nm
Die size250 mm2156 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C105 °C
Number of transistors3100 Million9800 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on A10-9620P and Ryzen 7 4700U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP4FP6
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-9620P and Ryzen 7 4700U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsDual-Channel DDR3/DDR4-1866 Memory Controller, PCIe 3.0 x8DDR4-3200/LPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NIno data+
FMAno data+
AVXno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-9620P and Ryzen 7 4700U are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-9620P and Ryzen 7 4700U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data68.27 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)AMD Radeon RX Vega 7

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-9620P and Ryzen 7 4700U.

PCIe versionno data3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-9620P 1.65
Ryzen 7 4700U 8.67
+425%

Ryzen 7 4700U outperforms A10-9620P by 425% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A10-9620P 2557
Ryzen 7 4700U 13411
+424%

Ryzen 7 4700U outperforms A10-9620P by 424% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A10-9620P 500
Ryzen 7 4700U 1357
+171%

Ryzen 7 4700U outperforms A10-9620P by 171% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A10-9620P 1103
Ryzen 7 4700U 4887
+343%

Ryzen 7 4700U outperforms A10-9620P by 343% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

A10-9620P 2277
Ryzen 7 4700U 5524
+143%

Ryzen 7 4700U outperforms A10-9620P by 143% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A10-9620P 7420
Ryzen 7 4700U 24771
+234%

Ryzen 7 4700U outperforms A10-9620P by 234% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

A10-9620P 14.41
Ryzen 7 4700U 7.89
+82.6%

A10-9620P outperforms Ryzen 7 4700U by 83% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

A10-9620P 3
Ryzen 7 4700U 13
+372%

Ryzen 7 4700U outperforms A10-9620P by 372% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

A10-9620P 230
Ryzen 7 4700U 1095
+376%

Ryzen 7 4700U outperforms A10-9620P by 376% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

A10-9620P 72
Ryzen 7 4700U 180
+150%

Ryzen 7 4700U outperforms A10-9620P by 150% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

A10-9620P 0.81
Ryzen 7 4700U 2.1
+159%

Ryzen 7 4700U outperforms A10-9620P by 159% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A10-9620P 1329
Ryzen 7 4700U 3963
+198%

Ryzen 7 4700U outperforms A10-9620P by 198% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A10-9620P 77
Ryzen 7 4700U 191
+150%

Ryzen 7 4700U outperforms A10-9620P by 150% in x264 encoding pass 1.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A10-9620P 16
Ryzen 7 4700U 57
+252%

Ryzen 7 4700U outperforms A10-9620P by 252% in x264 encoding pass 2.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.65 8.67
Integrated graphics card 2.45 7.42
Recency 1 January 2017 6 January 2020
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 25 Watt

The Ryzen 7 4700U is our recommended choice as it beats the A10-9620P in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-9620P and Ryzen 7 4700U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-9620P
A10-9620P
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
Ryzen 7 4700U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 280 votes

Rate A10-9620P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 1287 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 4700U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-9620P or Ryzen 7 4700U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.