A8-6500T vs A6-9500E

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

A6-9500E
2017
2 cores / 2 threads
1.14

A8-6500T outperforms A6-9500E by a moderate 10% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A6-9500E and A8-6500T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking22712197
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.95no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Richland (2013−2014)
Release date27 July 2017 (6 years ago)16 September 2013 (10 years ago)
Current price$32 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A6-9500E and A8-6500T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed3 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz3.1 GHz
L1 cacheno data192 KB
L2 cache1024 KB4096 KB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography28 nm32 nm
Die size246 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C71 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °C71 °C
Number of transistors1,178 million1,303 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on A6-9500E and A8-6500T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM4FM2
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-9500E and A8-6500T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
FRTC1no data
FreeSync1no data
PowerTune+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow++
PowerGating++
Out-of-band client managementno data-
VirusProtect++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-9500E and A8-6500T are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0no data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-9500E and A8-6500T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR3-1866
Max memory channels22

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R5 GraphicsAMD Radeon™ HD 8550D
iGPU core count4no data
Number of pipelinesno data256
Enduro++
Switchable graphicsno data1
UVD++
VCE++

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A6-9500E and A8-6500T integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort++
HDMI++

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A6-9500E and A8-6500T integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12DirectX® 11
Vulkan1no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-9500E and A8-6500T.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes8no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-9500E 1.14
A8-6500T 1.25
+9.6%

A8-6500T outperforms A6-9500E by 10% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A6-9500E 1756
A8-6500T 1929
+9.9%

A8-6500T outperforms A6-9500E by 10% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.14 1.25
Recency 27 July 2017 16 September 2013
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 28 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 45 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between A6-9500E and A8-6500T.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-9500E and A8-6500T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-9500E
A6-9500E
AMD A8-6500T
A8-6500T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 40 votes

Rate A6-9500E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.9 8 votes

Rate A8-6500T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-9500E or A8-6500T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.