Celeron 897 vs A10-7890K

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing A10-7890K and Celeron 897 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1839not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.41no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Power efficiency2.22no data
Architecture codenameGodaveri (2014−2016)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date11 January 2016 (8 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$150no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A10-7890K and Celeron 897 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed4 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 2.0
Bus rateno data4 × 5 GT/s
Multiplierno data16
L1 cache256 KB128 KB
L2 cache4096 KB512 KB
L3 cache0 KB2 MB
Chip lithography28 nm32 nm
Die size246 mm2131 mm2
Maximum core temperature72 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 million504 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on A10-7890K and Celeron 897 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFM2+no data
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-7890K and Celeron 897. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMAFMA4+
AVXAVX-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
HSA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-7890K and Celeron 897 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-7890K and Celeron 897. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR3-1333
Maximum memory sizeno data16 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data21.335 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R7 GraphicsIntel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
iGPU core count8no data
จำนวนพาธไลน์512no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-7890K and Celeron 897 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-7890K and Celeron 897 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-7890K and Celeron 897.

PCIe version3.0no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 28 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 17 Watt

A10-7890K has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron 897, on the other hand, has 458.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between A10-7890K and Celeron 897. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that A10-7890K is a desktop processor while Celeron 897 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-7890K and Celeron 897, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-7890K
A10-7890K
Intel Celeron 897
Celeron 897

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 123 votes

Rate A10-7890K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate Celeron 897 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-7890K or Celeron 897, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.