Intel Core m3-6Y30 vs AMD A10-5750M

Buy
VS
Buy
Price now 198$
Games supported 73%
AMD A10-5750M
AMD A10-5750M
Buy
  • Interface
  • Core clock speed
  • Max video memory
  • Memory type
  • Memory clock speed
  • Maximum resolution
Intel Core m3-6Y30
Intel Core m3-6Y30
Buy
  • Interface
  • Core clock speed
  • Max video memory
  • Memory type
  • Memory clock speed
  • Maximum resolution
Price now 531$
Games supported 73%

General info

Comparing A10-5750M and Core m3-6Y30 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rating18711875
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-SeriesIntel Core m3
Architecture codenameRichland (2013−2014)Skylake (2015−2016)
Release date12 March 2013 (10 years old)1 September 2015 (7 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$281
Current price$198 $531 (1.9x MSRP)

Technical specs

A10-5750M and Core m3-6Y30 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.5 GHz0.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz2.2 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512 KB
L3 cache0 KB4 MB
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size246 mm299 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)71 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 million1750 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierno data-

Compatibility

Information on A10-5750M and Core m3-6Y30 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFS1r2FCBGA1515
Thermal design power (TDP)35 Watt4.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-5750M and Core m3-6Y30. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA, DDR3-1866 ControllerIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
FMA+no data
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
My WiFino data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSXno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
SIPPno data-
Smart Responseno data+

Security technologies

A10-5750M and Core m3-6Y30 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
MPXno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-5750M and Core m3-6Y30 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-5750M and Core m3-6Y30. Depending on the motherboards, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3, DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data16 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data29.8 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 8650G-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-5750M and Core m3-6Y30.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data10

Benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Overall score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-5750M 1.72
m3-6Y30 1.72
  • Passmark
  • Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
  • Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
  • 3DMark06 CPU
  • wPrime 32
  • Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
  • Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
  • Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
  • Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core
  • TrueCrypt AES
  • WinRAR 4.0
  • x264 encoding pass 2
  • x264 encoding pass 1
  • Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core
  • Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core
  • Geekbench 2
  • Geekbench 4.0 64-bit multi-core
  • Geekbench 4.0 64-bit single-core

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 67%

A10-5750M 2174
+0.5%
m3-6Y30 2163

A10-5750M outperforms Core m3-6Y30 by 1% in Passmark.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

A10-5750M 2579
m3-6Y30 3388
+31.3%

Core m3-6Y30 outperforms A10-5750M by 31% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A10-5750M 6451
m3-6Y30 7158
+11%

Core m3-6Y30 outperforms A10-5750M by 11% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A10-5750M 3238
+16.5%
m3-6Y30 2780

A10-5750M outperforms Core m3-6Y30 by 16% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

A10-5750M 22.5
+7.1%
m3-6Y30 24.1

Core m3-6Y30 outperforms A10-5750M by 7% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

A10-5750M 2
+1.3%
m3-6Y30 2

A10-5750M outperforms Core m3-6Y30 by 1% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

A10-5750M 209
+2.5%
m3-6Y30 204

A10-5750M outperforms Core m3-6Y30 by 2% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

A10-5750M 76
m3-6Y30 86
+12.5%

Core m3-6Y30 outperforms A10-5750M by 13% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

A10-5750M 0.9
m3-6Y30 1
+16.5%

Core m3-6Y30 outperforms A10-5750M by 16% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A10-5750M 2
+25%
m3-6Y30 1

A10-5750M outperforms Core m3-6Y30 by 25% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 12%

A10-5750M 2035
+18%
m3-6Y30 1725

A10-5750M outperforms Core m3-6Y30 by 18% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 12%

A10-5750M 15
+12.8%
m3-6Y30 13

A10-5750M outperforms Core m3-6Y30 by 13% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 12%

A10-5750M 76
+4.3%
m3-6Y30 73

A10-5750M outperforms Core m3-6Y30 by 4% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 6%

A10-5750M 4787
+6.4%
m3-6Y30 4498

A10-5750M outperforms Core m3-6Y30 by 6% in Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core.

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 6%

A10-5750M 1816
m3-6Y30 2420
+33.3%

Core m3-6Y30 outperforms A10-5750M by 33% in Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core.

Geekbench 2

Benchmark coverage: 5%

A10-5750M 4742
m3-6Y30 5417
+14.2%

Core m3-6Y30 outperforms A10-5750M by 14% in Geekbench 2.

Geekbench 4.0 64-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 3%

A10-5750M 4963
m3-6Y30 5140
+3.6%

Core m3-6Y30 outperforms A10-5750M by 4% in Geekbench 4.0 64-bit multi-core.

Geekbench 4.0 64-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 3%

A10-5750M 2175
m3-6Y30 2762
+27%

Core m3-6Y30 outperforms A10-5750M by 27% in Geekbench 4.0 64-bit single-core.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Recency 12 March 2013 1 September 2015
Boost clock speed 3500 2200
Base clock speed 2500 900
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Thermal design power (TDP) 35 Watt 4 Watt

Technical City couldn't decide between

AMD A10-5750M
A10-5750M

and

Intel Core m3-6Y30
Core m3-6Y30

The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-5750M and Core m3-6Y30, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Competitors of A10-5750M by Intel

We believe that the nearest equivalent to A10-5750M by Intel is Core m3-6Y30, which is nearly equal in speed and lower by 4 positions in our rating.

Intel Core m3-6Y30 Core m3 6Y30
Compare

Here are some closest Intel rivals to A10-5750M:

Core i5-4250U 100.58
Core i3-5010U 100.58
A10-5750M 100
Core M-5Y51 98.84

Competitors of Core m3-6Y30 by AMD

We believe that the nearest equivalent to Core m3-6Y30 by AMD is A10-5750M, which is nearly equal in speed and higher by 4 positions in our rating.

AMD A10-5750M A10 5750M
Compare

Here are some closest AMD rivals to Core m3-6Y30:

A10-8700P 102.91
Pro A8-8600B 101.16
A10-5750M 100
Core m3-6Y30 100
A8-7200P 99.42
A10-7400P 98.26
3015Ce 95.35

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User rating

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 131 vote

Rate AMD A10-5750M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 38 votes

Rate Intel Core m3-6Y30 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-5750M or Core m3-6Y30, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.