Celeron Dual-Core T1500 vs A10-5750M

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

General info

Comparing A10-5750M and Celeron Dual-Core T1500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2084not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-SeriesIntel Celeron Dual-Core
Architecture codenameRichland (2013−2014)Merom (2006−2008)
Release date1 June 2013 (10 years old)1 May 2008 (15 years old)
Current price$198 no data

Technical specs

A10-5750M and Celeron Dual-Core T1500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.5 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz1.87 GHz
Bus supportno data533 MHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512 KB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography32 nm65 nm
Die size246 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)71 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on A10-5750M and Celeron Dual-Core T1500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFS1r2no data
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-5750M and Celeron Dual-Core T1500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA, DDR3-1866 Controllerno data
AES-NI+no data
FMA+no data
AVX+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-5750M and Celeron Dual-Core T1500 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-5750M and Celeron Dual-Core T1500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 8650Gno data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

A10-5750M 2579
+58.7%
Celeron Dual-Core T1500 1625

A10-5750M outperforms Celeron Dual-Core T1500 by 59% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A10-5750M 6451
+118%
Celeron Dual-Core T1500 2960

A10-5750M outperforms Celeron Dual-Core T1500 by 118% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A10-5750M 3238
+131%
Celeron Dual-Core T1500 1400

A10-5750M outperforms Celeron Dual-Core T1500 by 131% in 3DMark06 CPU.

Advantages and disadvantages


Recency 1 June 2013 1 May 2008
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 65 nm

We couldn't decide between A10-5750M and Celeron Dual-Core T1500. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-5750M and Celeron Dual-Core T1500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-5750M
A10-5750M
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1500
Celeron Dual-Core T1500

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 243 votes

Rate A10-5750M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 4 votes

Rate Celeron Dual-Core T1500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-5750M or Celeron Dual-Core T1500, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.