AMD EPYC 7H12 vs A10-5700

Price now 86$
Games supported 71%
AMD A10-5700
AMD A10-5700
  • Interface
  • Core clock speed
  • Max video memory
  • Memory type
  • Memory clock speed
  • Maximum resolution
  • Interface
  • Core clock speed
  • Max video memory
  • Memory type
  • Memory clock speed
  • Maximum resolution
Price now 4100$
Games supported 100%

General info

Comparing A10-5700 and EPYC 7H12 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rating17452
Place by popularityno data56
Value for money3.3412.04
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameTrinity (2012−2013)Zen 2 (2019−2020)
Release date2 October 2012
(10 years old)
18 September 2019
(3 years old)
Current price$86 $4100
Value for money

To get the index we compare the characteristics of the processors and their cost, taking into account the cost of other processors.

  • 0
  • 50
  • 100
  • 0
  • 50
  • 100

Technical specs

A10-5700 and EPYC 7H12 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Base clock speed3.4 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.3 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size246 mm2192 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)71 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierno data+


Information on A10-5700 and EPYC 7H12 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12 (Multiprocessor)
Thermal design power (TDP)65 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-5700 and EPYC 7H12. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NIno data+
AVXno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-5700 and EPYC 7H12 are enumerated here.


Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-5700 and EPYC 7H12. Depending on the motherboards, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Max memory channelsno data8
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.763 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 7660Dno data

Benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Overall score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-5700 2.21
EPYC 7H12 81.23
  • Passmark


Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 67%

A10-5700 2747
EPYC 7H12 100817

EPYC 7H12 outperforms A10-5700 by 3570% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages

Performance rating 2.21 81.23
Recency 2 October 2012 18 September 2019
Boost clock speed 4000 3300
Base clock speed 3400 2600
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Thermal design power (TDP) 65 Watt 280 Watt

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends


Be aware that A10-5700 is a desktop processor while EPYC 7H12 is a server/workstation one.

Should you still have questions on choice between A10-5700 and EPYC 7H12, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favourite CPU.

Competitors of A10-5700 by Intel

We believe that the nearest equivalent to A10-5700 from Intel is Pentium G4500, which is nearly equal in speed and lower by 1 position in our rating.

Intel Pentium G4500 Pentium G4500

Here are some closest Intel rivals to A10-5700:

Core i7-870S 101.36
Celeron G5925 100.45
A10-5700 100

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User rating

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 104 ratings

Rate AMD A10-5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 436 ratings

Rate AMD EPYC 7H12 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-5700 or EPYC 7H12, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.