To get the index we compare the characteristics of the processors and their cost, taking into account the cost of other processors.
AMD EPYC 7H12 vs A10-5700
- Interface
- Core clock speed
- Max video memory
- Memory type
- Memory clock speed
- Maximum resolution
- Interface
- Core clock speed
- Max video memory
- Memory type
- Memory clock speed
- Maximum resolution
General info
Comparing A10-5700 and EPYC 7H12 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance rating | 1745 | 2 |
Place by popularity | no data | 56 |
Value for money | 3.34 | 12.04 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
Series | no data | AMD EPYC |
Architecture codename | Trinity (2012−2013) | Zen 2 (2019−2020) |
Release date | 2 October 2012 (10 years old) | 18 September 2019 (3 years old) |
Current price | $86 | $4100 |
Technical specs
A10-5700 and EPYC 7H12 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core) |
Threads | 4 | 128 |
Base clock speed | 3.4 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 4 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 96K (per core) |
L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 512K (per core) |
L3 cache | 0 KB | 256 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 7 nm, 14 nm |
Die size | 246 mm2 | 192 mm2 |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 71 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 1,178 million | 4,800 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Unlocked multiplier | no data | + |
Compatibility
Information on A10-5700 and EPYC 7H12 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 (Multiprocessor) |
Socket | FM2 | TR4 |
Thermal design power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 280 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-5700 and EPYC 7H12. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | no data | + |
AVX | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-5700 and EPYC 7H12 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-5700 and EPYC 7H12. Depending on the motherboards, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4 Eight-channel |
Maximum memory size | no data | 4 TiB |
Max memory channels | no data | 8 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 204.763 GB/s |
ECC memory support | no data | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon HD 7660D | no data |
Benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Overall score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
- Passmark
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 67%
EPYC 7H12 outperforms A10-5700 by 3570% in Passmark.
Advantages and disadvantages
Performance rating | 2.21 | 81.23 |
Recency | 2 October 2012 | 18 September 2019 |
Boost clock speed | 4000 | 3300 |
Base clock speed | 3400 | 2600 |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 7 nm |
Thermal design power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 280 Watt |
Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends
Be aware that A10-5700 is a desktop processor while EPYC 7H12 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between A10-5700 and EPYC 7H12, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Competitors of A10-5700 by Intel
We believe that the nearest equivalent to A10-5700 from Intel is Pentium G4500, which is nearly equal in speed and lower by 1 position in our rating.
Here are some closest Intel rivals to A10-5700:
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.