FirePro A300 vs 3015e
Primary details
Comparing 3015e and FirePro A300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2065 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU) | no data |
| Power efficiency | 26.64 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Pollock (Zen) (2020) | Trinity (2012−2013) |
| Release date | 4 August 2020 (4 years ago) | 7 August 2012 (12 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
3015e and FirePro A300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 192 KB | 192K |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 4 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | no data | 246 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 74 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 1,303 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on 3015e and FirePro A300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | FT5 | FM2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by 3015e and FirePro A300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by 3015e and FirePro A300 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by 3015e and FirePro A300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR3-1866 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 600 MHz) | FirePro |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by 3015e and FirePro A300.
| PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 4 August 2020 | 7 August 2012 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 65 Watt |
3015e has an age advantage of 7 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 983.3% lower power consumption.
FirePro A300, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores.
We couldn't decide between 3015e and FirePro A300. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that 3015e is a notebook processor while FirePro A300 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between 3015e and FirePro A300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
