GeForce GT 430 PCI vs Zhongshan Subor Z+

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameFenghuangGF108
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 August 2018 (7 years ago)11 October 2010 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores153696
Core clock speed1300 MHz700 MHz
Number of transistorsno data585 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt49 Watt
Texture fill rate124.811.20
Floating-point processing power3.994 TFLOPS0.2688 TFLOPS
ROPs324
TMUs9616
L1 Cacheno data128 KB
L2 Cacheno data128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data145 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1200 MHz600 MHz
Memory bandwidth153.6 GB/s9.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.25.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-2.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 August 2018 11 October 2010
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 49 Watt

Zhongshan Subor Z+ has an age advantage of 7 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

GT 430 PCI, on the other hand, has 104.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Zhongshan Subor Z+ and GeForce GT 430 PCI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Zhongshan Subor Z+ is a notebook graphics card while GeForce GT 430 PCI is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Zhongshan Subor Z+
Zhongshan Subor Z+
NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 PCI
GeForce GT 430 PCI

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Zhongshan Subor Z on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 10 votes

Rate GeForce GT 430 PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Zhongshan Subor Z+ or GeForce GT 430 PCI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.