Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs ATI Radeon 9800 PRO MAXX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated685
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data14.48
ArchitectureR300 (2003−2008)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameR350DG1
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release dateno data31 October 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data768
Core clock speed380 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1650 MHz
Number of transistors117 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology150 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)94 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate3.04079.20
Floating-point processing powerno data2.534 TFLOPS
ROPs824
TMUs848
L2 Cacheno data1024 KB
L3 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 4.0 x4
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x Molexno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRLPDDR4X
Maximum RAM amount128 MB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed680 MBps2133 MHz
Memory bandwidth21.76 GB/s68.26 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0 (9_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.2

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 94 Watt 25 Watt

Iris Xe MAX Graphics has a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 1400% more advanced lithography process, and 276% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 9800 PRO MAXX and Iris Xe MAX Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 9800 PRO MAXX is a desktop graphics card while Iris Xe MAX Graphics is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon 9800 PRO MAXX
Radeon 9800 PRO MAXX
Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics
Iris Xe MAX Graphics

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon 9800 PRO MAXX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 284 votes

Rate Iris Xe MAX Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 9800 PRO MAXX or Iris Xe MAX Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.