Radeon HD 8240 Mobile IGP vs ATI Xbox 360 GPU

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameXenosKalindi
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date22 November 2005 (20 years ago)1 November 2013 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores240128
Core clock speed500 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistors232 million1,178 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rate8.0003.200
Floating-point processing power0.24 TFLOPS0.1024 TFLOPS
ROPs84
TMUs168

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPIGP
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1400 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.3
OpenGLN/A4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 November 2005 1 November 2013
Chip lithography 90 nm 28 nm

HD 8240 Mobile IGP has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 221% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Xbox 360 GPU and Radeon HD 8240 Mobile IGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xbox 360 GPU is a desktop graphics card while Radeon HD 8240 Mobile IGP is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 144 votes

Rate Xbox 360 GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.2 5 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8240 Mobile IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Xbox 360 GPU or Radeon HD 8240 Mobile IGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.