Radeon RX Vega Nano vs ATI Xbox 360 E GPU

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameXenos CoronaVega 10
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date10 June 2013 (12 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2404096
Core clock speed500 MHz1200 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1546 MHz
Number of transistors372 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology45 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt175 Watt
Texture fill rate8.000395.8
Floating-point processing power0.24 TFLOPSno data
ROPs864
TMUs16256

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Length264 mm152 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3HBM2
Maximum RAM amount512 MB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz1600 MBps
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/s409.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.0b, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_1)
Shader Model3.06.7
OpenGLN/A4.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 175 Watt

ATI Xbox 360 E GPU has 45.8% lower power consumption.

RX Vega Nano, on the other hand, has a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Xbox 360 E GPU and Radeon RX Vega Nano. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Xbox 360 E GPU
Xbox 360 E GPU
AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano
Radeon RX Vega Nano

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 7 votes

Rate Xbox 360 E GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 4 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega Nano on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Xbox 360 E GPU or Radeon RX Vega Nano, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.