Radeon PRO W7700 vs ATI Xbox 360 E GPU

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated52
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data31.22
Power efficiencyno data22.16
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)
GPU code nameXenos CoronaNavi 32
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date10 June 2013 (12 years ago)13 November 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2403072
Core clock speed500 MHz1900 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2600 MHz
Number of transistors372 million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology45 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt190 Watt
Texture fill rate8.000499.2
Floating-point processing power0.24 TFLOPS31.95 TFLOPS
ROPs896
TMUs16192
Ray Tracing Coresno data48
L0 Cacheno data768 KB
L1 Cacheno data768 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB
L3 Cacheno data64 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16
Length264 mm241 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/s576.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort 2.1

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model3.06.7
OpenGLN/A4.6
OpenCLN/A2.2
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 June 2013 13 November 2023
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 45 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 190 Watt

ATI Xbox 360 E GPU has 58.3% lower power consumption.

PRO W7700, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 800% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Xbox 360 E GPU and Radeon PRO W7700. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xbox 360 E GPU is a desktop graphics card while Radeon PRO W7700 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 7 votes

Rate Xbox 360 E GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 12 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Xbox 360 E GPU or Radeon PRO W7700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.