Quadro T2000 Max-Q vs ATI WinBoost

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated302
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data30.96
ArchitectureMach (1992−1997)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameMach64TU117
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date1 November 1995 (29 years ago)27 May 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$229 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1024
Core clock speed40 MHz1200 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1620 MHz
Number of transistors1 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology600 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data40 Watt
Texture fill rateno data103.7
Floating-point processing powerno data3.318 TFLOPS
ROPs132
TMUsno data64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIPCIe 3.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeEDOGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 MB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed40 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth320.0 MB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x VGANo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLN/A4.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 November 1995 27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 2 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 600 nm 12 nm

T2000 Max-Q has an age advantage of 23 years, a 204700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 4900% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between WinBoost and Quadro T2000 Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that WinBoost is a desktop card while Quadro T2000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI WinBoost
WinBoost
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
Quadro T2000 Max-Q

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate WinBoost on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 67 votes

Rate Quadro T2000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.