ATI Radeon Xpress 2100 IGP vs ATI Wii GPU

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureR500 (2005−2007)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameHollywoodRS780
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date19 November 2006 (19 years ago)4 March 2008 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data40
Core clock speed243 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors107 million180 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Wattno data
Texture fill rate0.972.000
Floating-point processing powerno data0.04 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs44

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount64 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed243 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth3.888 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A10.0 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGLN/A3.3
OpenCLN/A1.0
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 November 2006 4 March 2008
Chip lithography 90 nm 65 nm

ATI Xpress 2100 IGP has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 38% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Wii GPU and Radeon Xpress 2100 IGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Wii GPU is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Xpress 2100 IGP is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 23 votes

Rate Wii GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Radeon Xpress 2100 IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Wii GPU or Radeon Xpress 2100 IGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.