UHD Graphics G1 32EU Mobile vs ATI Video Xpression+

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureMach (1992−1997)Generation 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code nameMach64Ice Lake GT1
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 May 1996 (29 years ago)29 May 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data256
Core clock speed62 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data900 MHz
Number of transistors1 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology600 nm10 nm+
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data14.40
Floating-point processing powerno data0.4608 TFLOPS
ROPs18
TMUsno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIRing Bus
Width1-slotno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeEDOSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed62 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth496.0 MB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGAPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLN/A4.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 May 1996 29 May 2019
Chip lithography 600 nm 10 nm

UHD Graphics G1 32EU Mobile has an age advantage of 23 years, and a 5900% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Video Xpression+ and UHD Graphics G1 32EU Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Video Xpression+ is a desktop graphics card while UHD Graphics G1 32EU Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Video Xpression+
Video Xpression+
Intel UHD Graphics G1 32EU Mobile
UHD Graphics G1 32EU Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Video Xpression on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 17 votes

Rate UHD Graphics G1 32EU Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Video Xpression+ or UHD Graphics G1 32EU Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.