ATI Video Xpression+ vs Radeon R5 330 OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Mach (1992−1997)
GPU code nameHainanMach64
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date5 May 2015 (10 years ago)1 May 1996 (29 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320no data
Core clock speed830 MHz62 MHz
Boost clock speed855 MHzno data
Number of transistors690 million1 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm600 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Wattno data
Texture fill rate17.10no data
Floating-point processing power0.5472 TFLOPSno data
ROPs81
TMUs20no data
L1 Cache80 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCI
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3EDO
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz62 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s496.0 MB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)N/A
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 May 2015 1 May 1996
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 2 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 600 nm

R5 330 OEM has an age advantage of 19 years, a 102300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2042.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 330 OEM and Video Xpression+. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 330 OEM
Radeon R5 330 OEM
ATI Video Xpression+
Video Xpression+

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 17 votes

Rate Radeon R5 330 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Video Xpression on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R5 330 OEM or Video Xpression+, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.