GeForce G110M vs ATI Video Xpression+

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureMach (1992−1997)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameMach64G96C
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 May 1996 (30 years ago)8 January 2009 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data16
Core clock speed62 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistors1 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology600 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data14 Watt
Texture fill rateno data3.200
Floating-point processing powerno data0.032 TFLOPS
Gigaflopsno data48
ROPs14
TMUsno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0
InterfacePCIPCIe 2.0 x16
Width1-slotno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeEDOGDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 MBUp to 1 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed62 MHz500 (DDR2)/700 (GDDR3) MHz
Memory bandwidth496.0 MB/s8 (DDR2)/11 (GDDR3)

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGADisplayPortDual Link DVIVGAHDMISingle Link DVI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power managementno data8.0

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A11.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGLN/A2.1
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 May 1996 8 January 2009
Chip lithography 600 nm 55 nm

GeForce G110M has an age advantage of 12 years, and a 991% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Video Xpression+ and GeForce G110M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Video Xpression+ is a desktop graphics card while GeForce G110M is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Video Xpression on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 5 votes

Rate GeForce G110M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Video Xpression+ or GeForce G110M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.