ATI Radeon X1050 vs VIA Chrome9 HC

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared VIA Chrome9 HC with Radeon X1050, including specs and performance data.

VIA Chrome9 HC
2007
0.01

X1050 outperforms Chrome9 HC by a whopping 1100% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking15821509
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.38
Architectureno dataRage 9 (2003−2006)
GPU code nameVN896RV370
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 March 2007 (18 years ago)7 December 2006 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3no data
Core clock speed1 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed250 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data107 million
Manufacturing process technologyno data110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data24 Watt
Texture fill rateno data1.600
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeonboardDDR2
Maximum RAM amountno data128 MB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data333 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data5.328 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXonboard9.0
OpenGLno data2.0
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

VIA Chrome9 HC 0.01
ATI X1050 0.12
+1100%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

VIA Chrome9 HC 4
Samples: 57
ATI X1050 49
+1125%
Samples: 49

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−1100%
60−65
+1100%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−1100%
60−65
+1100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−1067%
70−75
+1067%
Valorant 21−24
−1074%
270−280
+1074%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 9−10
−1011%
100−105
+1011%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 7−8
−1043%
80−85
+1043%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−1100%
60−65
+1100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−1067%
70−75
+1067%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−1025%
45−50
+1025%
Valorant 21−24
−1074%
270−280
+1074%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 7−8
−1043%
80−85
+1043%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−1100%
60−65
+1100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−1067%
70−75
+1067%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−1025%
45−50
+1025%
Valorant 21−24
−1074%
270−280
+1074%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 0−1 0−1

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−1043%
160−170
+1043%
Valorant 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.01 0.12
Recency 1 March 2007 7 December 2006

VIA Chrome9 HC has an age advantage of 2 months.

ATI X1050, on the other hand, has a 1100% higher aggregate performance score.

The Radeon X1050 is our recommended choice as it beats the VIA Chrome9 HC in performance tests.

Be aware that VIA Chrome9 HC is a notebook graphics card while Radeon X1050 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


VIA Chrome9 HC
Chrome9 HC
ATI Radeon X1050
Radeon X1050

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 66 votes

Rate VIA Chrome9 HC on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 21 votes

Rate Radeon X1050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about VIA Chrome9 HC or Radeon X1050, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.