GeForce GTX 1650 vs VIA Chrome9 HC

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared VIA Chrome9 HC with GeForce GTX 1650, including specs and performance data.

VIA Chrome9 HC
2007
0.01

1650 outperforms Chrome9 HC by a whopping 177900% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1568321
Place by popularitynot in top-1005
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data28.77
Power efficiencyno data19.12
Architectureno dataTuring (2018−2022)
GPU code nameVN896TU117
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 March 2007 (18 years ago)23 April 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3896
Core clock speed1 MHz1485 MHz
Boost clock speed250 MHz1665 MHz
Number of transistorsno data4,700 million
Manufacturing process technologyno data12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data75 Watt
Texture fill rateno data93.24
Floating-point processing powerno data2.984 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data56
L1 Cacheno data896 KB
L2 Cacheno data1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeonboardGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data128.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXonboard12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2.131
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

VIA Chrome9 HC 0.01
GTX 1650 17.80
+177900%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

VIA Chrome9 HC 4
Samples: 57
GTX 1650 7871
+196675%
Samples: 28217

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD-0−164
1440p-0−138
4K-0−124

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.33
1440pno data3.92
4Kno data6.21

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 40−45
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−640%
35−40
+640%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 40−45
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−4400%
90
+4400%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−640%
35−40
+640%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−1400%
90
+1400%
Valorant 24−27
−1117%
292
+1117%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 9−10
−2467%
230−240
+2467%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 40−45
Dota 2 7−8
−1286%
97
+1286%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−4050%
83
+4050%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−640%
35−40
+640%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−1333%
86
+1333%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−1675%
71
+1675%
Valorant 24−27
−983%
260
+983%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 40−45
Dota 2 7−8
−1214%
92
+1214%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−3150%
65
+3150%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−640%
35−40
+640%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−1000%
66
+1000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−925%
41
+925%
Valorant 24−27
−192%
70
+192%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−1850%
35−40
+1850%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 0−1 170−180

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−4500%
46
+4500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 31

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−120%
33
+120%
Valorant 0−1 83

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−2500%
26
+2500%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−450%
11
+450%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 61
+0%
61
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Far Cry 5 69
+0%
69
+0%
Fortnite 211
+0%
211
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 73
+0%
73
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 53
+0%
53
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Far Cry 5 63
+0%
63
+0%
Fortnite 85
+0%
85
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 62
+0%
62
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 81
+0%
81
+0%
Metro Exodus 35
+0%
35
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 51
+0%
51
+0%
Far Cry 5 59
+0%
59
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 61
+0%
61
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 40
+0%
40
+0%
Metro Exodus 20
+0%
20
+0%
Valorant 177
+0%
177
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 39
+0%
39
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 40
+0%
40
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 42
+0%
42
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Metro Exodus 12
+0%
12
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 26
+0%
26
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21
+0%
21
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Dota 2 59
+0%
59
+0%
Far Cry 5 19
+0%
19
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30
+0%
30
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 1650 is 4500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1650 performs better in 23 tests (39%)
  • there's a draw in 36 tests (61%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.01 17.80
Recency 1 March 2007 23 April 2019

GTX 1650 has a 177900% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 12 years.

The GeForce GTX 1650 is our recommended choice as it beats the VIA Chrome9 HC in performance tests.

Be aware that VIA Chrome9 HC is a notebook graphics card while GeForce GTX 1650 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


VIA Chrome9 HC
Chrome9 HC
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 66 votes

Rate VIA Chrome9 HC on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 26859 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about VIA Chrome9 HC or GeForce GTX 1650, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.