T1000 8 GB vs UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs with T1000 8 GB, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
2020
28 Watt
3.93

T1000 8 GB outperforms UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs by a whopping 336% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking664289
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency11.1727.25
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeTU117
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date15 August 2020 (4 years ago)6 May 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48896
Core clock speed350 MHz1065 MHz
Boost clock speed1450 MHz1395 MHz
Number of transistorsno data4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rateno data78.12
Floating-point processing powerno data2.5 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data56

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data8 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data160.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x mini-DisplayPort

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.2
CUDA-7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD17
−312%
70−75
+312%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 10−11
−300%
40−45
+300%
Counter-Strike 2 46
−335%
200−210
+335%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
−309%
45−50
+309%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 10−11
−300%
40−45
+300%
Battlefield 5 19
−321%
80−85
+321%
Counter-Strike 2 29
−314%
120−130
+314%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−289%
35−40
+289%
Far Cry 5 16
−306%
65−70
+306%
Fortnite 24−27
−300%
100−105
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
−325%
85−90
+325%
Forza Horizon 5 15
−333%
65−70
+333%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−312%
70−75
+312%
Valorant 36
−317%
150−160
+317%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 10−11
−300%
40−45
+300%
Battlefield 5 16
−306%
65−70
+306%
Counter-Strike 2 7
−329%
30−33
+329%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 25
−300%
100−105
+300%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−289%
35−40
+289%
Dota 2 26
−323%
110−120
+323%
Far Cry 5 15
−333%
65−70
+333%
Fortnite 24−27
−300%
100−105
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
−325%
85−90
+325%
Forza Horizon 5 14
−329%
60−65
+329%
Grand Theft Auto V 10
−300%
40−45
+300%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−275%
30−33
+275%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−312%
70−75
+312%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 15
−333%
65−70
+333%
Valorant 55−60
−329%
240−250
+329%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14
−329%
60−65
+329%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−289%
35−40
+289%
Dota 2 24
−317%
100−105
+317%
Far Cry 5 14
−329%
60−65
+329%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
−325%
85−90
+325%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−312%
70−75
+312%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8
−275%
30−33
+275%
Valorant 55−60
−329%
240−250
+329%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27
−300%
100−105
+300%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−300%
24−27
+300%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
−306%
130−140
+306%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
−300%
16−18
+300%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−306%
130−140
+306%
Valorant 45−50
−335%
200−210
+335%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−275%
30−33
+275%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−300%
40−45
+300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−329%
30−33
+329%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 8−9
−275%
30−33
+275%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−306%
65−70
+306%
Valorant 21−24
−329%
90−95
+329%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Dota 2 14−16
−329%
60−65
+329%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−300%
16−18
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−320%
21−24
+320%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
−320%
21−24
+320%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
−320%
21−24
+320%

This is how UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs and T1000 8 GB compete in popular games:

  • T1000 8 GB is 312% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.93 17.12
Recency 15 August 2020 6 May 2021
Chip lithography 10 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 50 Watt

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs has a 20% more advanced lithography process, and 78.6% lower power consumption.

T1000 8 GB, on the other hand, has a 335.6% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 8 months.

The T1000 8 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is a notebook card while T1000 8 GB is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
NVIDIA T1000 8 GB
T1000 8 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 510 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 34 votes

Rate T1000 8 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs or T1000 8 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.