RTX A2000 vs UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs

Aggregate performance score

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
2021
4.39

RTX A2000 outperforms UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs by a whopping 711% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking629127
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data19.08
ArchitectureGen. 12 (2021)Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeGA106
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date30 March 2021 (3 years ago)10 August 2021 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$449
Current priceno data$567 (1.3x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores323328
Core clock speed350 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1450 MHz1200 MHz
Number of transistorsno data12,000 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data70 Watt
Texture fill rateno data124.8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs and RTX A2000 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data167 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data6 GB
Memory bus widthno data192 Bit
Memory clock speedno data12 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data288.0 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX 12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkanno data1.3
CUDAno data8.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD16
−650%
120−130
+650%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−678%
70−75
+678%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 11
−673%
85−90
+673%
Battlefield 5 18
−678%
140−150
+678%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−700%
80−85
+700%
Far Cry 5 14
−686%
110−120
+686%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−692%
95−100
+692%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
−700%
160−170
+700%
Hitman 3 16
−650%
120−130
+650%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−692%
190−200
+692%
Red Dead Redemption 2 13
−669%
100−105
+669%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−650%
120−130
+650%
Watch Dogs: Legion 20−22
−700%
160−170
+700%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−678%
70−75
+678%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9
−678%
70−75
+678%
Battlefield 5 16
−650%
120−130
+650%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−700%
80−85
+700%
Far Cry 5 13
−669%
100−105
+669%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−692%
95−100
+692%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
−700%
160−170
+700%
Hitman 3 12
−692%
95−100
+692%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−692%
190−200
+692%
Metro Exodus 6
−650%
45−50
+650%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4
−650%
30−33
+650%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−650%
120−130
+650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−700%
80−85
+700%
Watch Dogs: Legion 20−22
−700%
160−170
+700%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−678%
70−75
+678%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−700%
24−27
+700%
Battlefield 5 15
−700%
120−130
+700%
Far Cry 5 12
−692%
95−100
+692%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−692%
95−100
+692%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
−700%
160−170
+700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−700%
80−85
+700%
Watch Dogs: Legion 20−22
−700%
160−170
+700%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−650%
45−50
+650%
Hitman 3 9−10
−678%
70−75
+678%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−700%
80−85
+700%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−650%
60−65
+650%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−650%
30−33
+650%
Battlefield 5 8−9
−650%
60−65
+650%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−686%
55−60
+686%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
−650%
45−50
+650%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−686%
55−60
+686%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−700%
16−18
+700%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−700%
16−18
+700%
Hitman 3 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−650%
30−33
+650%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−650%
45−50
+650%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−700%
40−45
+700%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−700%
24−27
+700%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−700%
16−18
+700%
Battlefield 5 3−4
−700%
24−27
+700%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−700%
16−18
+700%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−700%
24−27
+700%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−700%
24−27
+700%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%

This is how UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs and RTX A2000 compete in popular games:

  • RTX A2000 is 650% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.39 35.62
Recency 30 March 2021 10 August 2021
Chip lithography 14 nm 8 nm

The RTX A2000 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is a notebook card while RTX A2000 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
NVIDIA RTX A2000
RTX A2000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 15 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 520 votes

Rate RTX A2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.