UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) vs UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) with UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N), including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
2021
3.29
+41.8%

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) outperforms UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) by a considerable 42% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking743852
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 12 (2021−2023)Gen. 12 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameRocket Lake XeAlder Lake Xe
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date30 March 2021 (3 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3224
Core clock speed350 MHz450 MHz
Boost clock speed1450 MHz750 MHz
Manufacturing process technology14 nm10 nm

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Shared memory++

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112_1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) 3.29
+41.8%
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) 2.32

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) 2811
+88.8%
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) 1489

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) 5134
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) 5776
+12.5%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) 2175
+83.6%
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) 1185

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) 11315
+36.3%
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) 8303

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) 50628
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) 55681
+10%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) 634
+97.5%
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) 321

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18
+125%
8
−125%
1440p21
+50%
14−16
−50%
4K12
+50%
8−9
−50%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2 0−1
Battlefield 5 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+45.5%
10−12
−45.5%
Hitman 3 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 64
+237%
18−20
−237%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+18.2%
10−12
−18.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+5.4%
35−40
−5.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2 0−1
Battlefield 5 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+45.5%
10−12
−45.5%
Hitman 3 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 51
+168%
18−20
−168%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12
+20%
10
−20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+7.7%
12−14
−7.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+5.4%
35−40
−5.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+45.5%
10−12
−45.5%
Hitman 3 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+21.1%
18−20
−21.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 13
+8.3%
12
−8.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+250%
4
−250%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+5.4%
35−40
−5.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Hitman 3 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
+38.5%
12−14
−38.5%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%

This is how UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) and UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is 125% faster in 1080p
  • UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is 50% faster in 1440p
  • UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is 50% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is 300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is ahead in 46 tests (90%)
  • there's a draw in 5 tests (10%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.29 2.32
Recency 30 March 2021 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) has a 41.8% higher aggregate performance score.

UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is a desktop card while UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
Intel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 8 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 79 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.