Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) vs UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) with Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
2021
3.30

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) outperforms UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) by a whopping 210% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking750448
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 12 (2021−2023)Xe LPG (2023)
GPU code nameRocket Lake XeMeteor Lake iGPU
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date30 March 2021 (3 years ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores324
Core clock speed350 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1450 MHz1950 MHz
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Shared memory++

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112_2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) 3.30
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) 10.23
+210%

  • Other tests
    • 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
    • 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
    • 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
    • 3DMark Ice Storm GPU
    • 3DMark Time Spy Graphics

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) 2811
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) 6776
+141%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) 2175
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) 5295
+144%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) 11315
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) 29765
+163%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) 50628
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) 295187
+483%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) 634
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) 1930
+204%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD19
−31.6%
25
+31.6%
1440p16
−181%
45−50
+181%
4K9
−200%
27−30
+200%

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
Atomic Heart 8−9
−200%
24−27
+200%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−30%
13
+30%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%
Atomic Heart 8−9
−200%
24−27
+200%
Battlefield 5 10−12
−282%
40−45
+282%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−10%
11
+10%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−357%
30−35
+357%
Fortnite 16−18
−194%
50−55
+194%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−233%
50
+233%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
−400%
24−27
+400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−143%
30−35
+143%
Valorant 64
−43.8%
90−95
+43.8%
Atomic Heart 8−9
−100%
16
+100%
Battlefield 5 10−12
−282%
40−45
+282%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−30%
13
+30%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 55−60
−193%
170−180
+193%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−233%
20−22
+233%
Dota 2 35
−186%
100−105
+186%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−243%
24
+243%
Fortnite 16−18
−235%
55−60
+235%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−160%
39
+160%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
−400%
24−27
+400%
Grand Theft Auto V 9−10
−66.7%
15
+66.7%
Metro Exodus 6
−217%
18−20
+217%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−143%
30−35
+143%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−150%
24−27
+150%
Valorant 51
−80.4%
90−95
+80.4%
Battlefield 5 10−12
−282%
40−45
+282%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−80%
18−20
+80%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−233%
20−22
+233%
Dota 2 32
−197%
95−100
+197%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−357%
30−35
+357%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−100%
30
+100%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
−400%
24−27
+400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−143%
30−35
+143%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−200%
30−33
+200%
Valorant 45−50
−91.7%
90−95
+91.7%
Fortnite 16−18
−194%
50−55
+194%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
−217%
70−75
+217%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−1000%
10−12
+1000%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−187%
65−70
+187%
Valorant 36
−206%
110−120
+206%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−300%
20−22
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−229%
21−24
+229%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5
−325%
16−18
+325%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−200%
14−16
+200%
Fortnite 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%
Atomic Heart 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−25%
20−22
+25%
Valorant 16−18
−181%
45−50
+181%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Dota 2 12
−192%
35−40
+192%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−433%
16−18
+433%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%
Fortnite 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
Atomic Heart 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Atomic Heart 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Atomic Heart 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Fortnite 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

This is how UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) and Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) compete in popular games:

  • Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is 32% faster in 1080p
  • Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is 181% faster in 1440p
  • Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is 200% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is 1000% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is ahead in 43 tests (74%)
  • there's a draw in 15 tests (26%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.30 10.23
Recency 30 March 2021 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) has a 210% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is a desktop card while Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9
8 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1
10 votes

Rate Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) or Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.