UHD Graphics 730 vs UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) with UHD Graphics 730, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
2021
4.62
+13.5%

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) outperforms UHD Graphics 730 by a moderate 14% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking655694
Place by popularitynot in top-10098
Power efficiencyno data19.09
ArchitectureGen. 12 (2021−2023)Generation 12.2 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeRaptor Lake GT1
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date11 May 2021 (3 years ago)3 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32192
Core clock speed350 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1450 MHz1550 MHz
Manufacturing process technology10 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data18.60
Floating-point processing powerno data0.5952 TFLOPS
ROPsno data6
TMUsno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataRing Bus
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataMotherboard Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
1440p25
+19%
21−24
−19%
4K12
+20%
10−12
−20%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 15
+25%
12−14
−25%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
+25%
8−9
−25%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Battlefield 5 18
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Far Cry 5 14
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Fortnite 24−27
+23.8%
21−24
−23.8%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
Forza Horizon 5 12
+20%
10−11
−20%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Valorant 55−60
+14%
50−55
−14%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Battlefield 5 16
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 75−80
+20%
65−70
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Dota 2 36
+20%
30−33
−20%
Far Cry 5 13
+30%
10−11
−30%
Fortnite 24−27
+23.8%
21−24
−23.8%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 11
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Valorant 55−60
+14%
50−55
−14%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 15
+25%
12−14
−25%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Dota 2 33
+22.2%
27−30
−22.2%
Far Cry 5 12
+20%
10−11
−20%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Valorant 55−60
+14%
50−55
−14%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27
+23.8%
21−24
−23.8%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
+25.9%
27−30
−25.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+14.8%
27−30
−14.8%
Valorant 45−50
+20%
40−45
−20%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Valorant 21−24
+22.2%
18−20
−22.2%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 12
+20%
10−11
−20%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%

This is how UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) and UHD Graphics 730 compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is 29% faster in 1080p
  • UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is 19% faster in 1440p
  • UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is 20% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.62 4.07
Recency 11 May 2021 3 January 2023

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) has a 13.5% higher aggregate performance score.

UHD Graphics 730, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.

The UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 730 in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is a notebook card while UHD Graphics 730 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
Intel UHD Graphics 730
UHD Graphics 730

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 30 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 1344 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 730 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) or UHD Graphics 730, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.