Radeon PRO V710 vs UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) with Radeon PRO V710, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
2021
4.10

PRO V710 outperforms UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) by a whopping 624% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking697191
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data15.12
ArchitectureGen. 12 (2021−2023)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeNavi 32
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date11 May 2021 (4 years ago)3 October 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores323456
Core clock speed350 MHz1900 MHz
Boost clock speed1450 MHz2000 MHz
Number of transistorsno data28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data158 Watt
Texture fill rateno data432.0
Floating-point processing powerno data27.65 TFLOPS
ROPsno data96
TMUsno data216
Ray Tracing Coresno data54
L0 Cacheno data864 KB
L1 Cacheno data768 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB
L3 Cacheno data54 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data28 GB
Memory bus widthno data224 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data504.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.2
Vulkan-1.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD17
−606%
120−130
+606%
1440p30
−600%
210−220
+600%
4K12
−608%
85−90
+608%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 53
−560%
350−400
+560%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
−600%
70−75
+600%
Hogwarts Legacy 12
−608%
85−90
+608%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 18
−622%
130−140
+622%
Counter-Strike 2 34
−606%
240−250
+606%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−622%
65−70
+622%
Far Cry 5 14
−614%
100−105
+614%
Fortnite 24−27
−592%
180−190
+592%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−614%
150−160
+614%
Forza Horizon 5 16
−588%
110−120
+588%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
−600%
70−75
+600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−622%
130−140
+622%
Valorant 55−60
−602%
400−450
+602%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16
−588%
110−120
+588%
Counter-Strike 2 15
−567%
100−105
+567%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 75−80
−614%
550−600
+614%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−622%
65−70
+622%
Dota 2 36
−622%
260−270
+622%
Far Cry 5 13
−592%
90−95
+592%
Fortnite 24−27
−592%
180−190
+592%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−614%
150−160
+614%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
−608%
85−90
+608%
Grand Theft Auto V 11
−582%
75−80
+582%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
−600%
70−75
+600%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−588%
55−60
+588%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−622%
130−140
+622%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16
−588%
110−120
+588%
Valorant 55−60
−602%
400−450
+602%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 15
−567%
100−105
+567%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−622%
65−70
+622%
Dota 2 33
−597%
230−240
+597%
Far Cry 5 12
−608%
85−90
+608%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−614%
150−160
+614%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
−600%
70−75
+600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−622%
130−140
+622%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8
−588%
55−60
+588%
Valorant 55−60
−602%
400−450
+602%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27
−592%
180−190
+592%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−588%
55−60
+588%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
−597%
230−240
+597%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
−575%
27−30
+575%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−600%
21−24
+600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−597%
230−240
+597%
Valorant 45−50
−538%
300−310
+538%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−600%
21−24
+600%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−588%
55−60
+588%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−600%
70−75
+600%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
−575%
27−30
+575%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−567%
40−45
+567%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 9−10
−622%
65−70
+622%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−606%
120−130
+606%
Valorant 21−24
−582%
150−160
+582%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Dota 2 12
−608%
85−90
+608%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−600%
21−24
+600%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−567%
40−45
+567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
−600%
35−40
+600%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
−600%
35−40
+600%

This is how UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) and PRO V710 compete in popular games:

  • PRO V710 is 606% faster in 1080p
  • PRO V710 is 600% faster in 1440p
  • PRO V710 is 608% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.10 29.69
Recency 11 May 2021 3 October 2024
Chip lithography 10 nm 5 nm

PRO V710 has a 624.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon PRO V710 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is a notebook graphics card while Radeon PRO V710 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
AMD Radeon PRO V710
Radeon PRO V710

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 30 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Radeon PRO V710 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) or Radeon PRO V710, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.